Lockdowns Ngā noho rāhui
What people said worked well | Ko ngā mea i kī te tangata i pai
- Lockdowns were brought in quickly and decisively.
- People who supported lockdowns told us they:
- were effective and necessary (even though they were hard)
- reduced anxiety
- kept people safe
- saved lives
- reduced transmission of COVID-19
- resulted in less of an impact on the health system.
What people said didn’t work or could be improved | Ko ngā mea i kī te tangata kāore i pai, me pai ake rānei
- People who told us they opposed the use of lockdowns cited various reasons, including that they:
- had disproportionate social and economic impacts (did more harm than good)
- don’t work
- were too strict
- went on for too long
- happened too often.
- The Auckland lockdowns were particularly hard for those living in the city, and also in Northland.
What people suggested for the future | Ngā mea i whakatakotoria mai mō muri ake
- Lockdowns should be more flexible.
- Lockdowns should only be used in extreme circumstances.
The most common topic the Inquiry received public feedback on, in terms of the public health response to COVID-19 in Aotearoa New Zealand, was the use of lockdowns to control the spread of the virus.
“I was pregnant during the first lockdown (March 2020) and had a lot of anxiety around my pregnancy, so the swift lockdown helped alleviate that to a certain degree.”
35–44-year-old female, Wellington
Many people told us they thought lockdowns were hard but effective and necessary. These people stated that going into lockdown helped to reduce anxiety, keep people safe and save lives.
Some added that lockdowns helped to limit the spread of COVID-19, which meant the health system had time to prepare and was less impacted.
“Locking down a healthy population was bad for the economy, education and mental health.”
Person from Wellington
We were also told that because of lockdowns and the slowed spread of COVID-19, people in Aotearoa New Zealand had time to get vaccinated before the virus hit hard, further helping the health system to prepare and lessening the impact of the virus on the country.
On the other hand, many others felt lockdowns did more harm than good. These people thought lockdowns had too much of an impact on people’s mental health and social wellbeing, and the economy.
Others said that lockdowns simply don’t work, that they went on for too long, or that they were excessive or unnecessary.
Some people also told us they agreed with the initial nation-wide lockdown in March 2020, but felt that later lockdowns should not have happened.
Some people suggested that if another pandemic occurred, Aotearoa New Zealand should use different strategies instead of lockdowns, or that if lockdowns are needed, they should be more flexible or only be used in extreme situations.
Some people did not think it was lawful to put a country into lockdown, and felt their rights had been breached by doing so. People sometimes compared lockdown to being on ‘home detention’ or ‘house arrest’.
“The initial response even with hindsight was appropriate for the situation. No one knew how bad, or not, this disease was going to be. The first lockdown nationwide was appropriate and tolerable.
However, lockdowns after that were difficult to deal with, especially when families were separated by borders within the country and could not support each other. Visiting my elderly parents in Auckland was not an option and was extremely hard.”
55–64-year-old female, Waikato